4.3 Article

Occupational and non-occupational risk factors for neck and lower back pain among computer workers: a cross-sectional study

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2021.1899650

关键词

musculoskeletal disorders; spinal pain syndrome; lower back pain; neck pain; computer workers; ergonomics of computer work

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education/National Center for Research and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that prolonged computer use and increased job demands increase the risk of neck pain, while social support and seat-plate height adjustment can reduce the risk. Risk factors for LBP include smoking, long hours spent working with a computer, increased physical exertion at work, increased work demands, and older age.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to identify major determinants for neck and lower back pain (LBP) among office workers of different ages. Methods. Computer workers (N = 2000) responded to a questionnaire on demographics, musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), lifestyle characteristics, ergonomics of computer work and psychosocial and physical job characteristics. Results. Over 48% of respondents complained of MSDs last year, in particular neck pain and LBP. The results of logistic regression analysis revealed that prolonged computer time (odds ratio [OR] 1.92) and increased job demands (OR 1.06) were likely to increase the risk of neck pain, while social support (OR 0.96) and the use of seat-plate height adjustment (OR 0.64) would help to reduce the risk. Risk factors for LBP included smoking more than 14 cigarettes a day (OR 2.21), long hours spent working with a computer (OR 1.94), increased physical exertion at work (OR 1.29), increased work demands (OR 1.03) and older age (OR 1.03). Conclusions. The most effective way to eliminate MSD hazards in the workplace is to develop health programmes aimed at advocating healthy lifestyle behaviours and raising workers' awareness of workstation ergonomics and work organization, especially for women and older workers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据