4.7 Article

Antifibrotic effects of cyclosporine A on TGF-β1-treated lung fibroblasts and lungs from bleomycin-treated mice: role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 3359-3371

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201601357R

关键词

pulmonary fibrosis; immunosuppressants; dedifferentiation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Sciences, and Technology, Japan [23590106, 24390137]
  2. Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from Japan Science Society [26-509]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K08303, 23590106, 24390137] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic lung disorder that is characterized by aberrant tissue remodeling and the formation of fibroblastic foci that are composed of fibrogenic myofibroblasts. TGF-beta 1 is one of the factors that are responsible for fibrosis as it promotes fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation (FMD) and is associated with up-regulation of a-smooth muscle actin. Therefore, inhibition of FMD may represent an effective strategy for the treatment of IPF. Here, we describe the treatment of human lung fibroblasts (WI-38 and HFL-1 cells) with cyclosporine A (CsA), which reduces TGF-beta 1-induced FMD via degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha). In addition, in primary myofibroblast-like cells that were obtained from a patient with pulmonary fibrosis, treatment with CsA and an HIF-1 alpha inhibitor (HIFi) decreased the expression levels of a-smooth muscle actin and fibronectin, which indicated that CsA and HIFi promote dedifferentiation of myofibroblasts. In mice intratracheally administered CsA or HIFi at an early fibrotic stage [ 7, 8, and 9 d postinstillation (dpi) of bleomycin], marked alleviation of lung fibrosis was observed at 14 dpi. These results suggest that CsA exhibits antifibrotic effects by degrading HIF-1 alpha and that the CsA-HIF-1 alpha axis provides new insights into therapeutic options for the treatment of IPF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据