4.0 Article

Influence of Industrial Processing on Physiochemical Characteristics of Soybean Oil and Deodorizer Distillates

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF PAKISTAN
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 201-211

出版社

CHEM SOC PAKISTAN

关键词

Soybean oil; Processing; Physicochemical characteristics; Fatty acid profile; Sterols

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan [6717/Sindh/NRPU/RD/HEC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the impact of industrial processing on soybean oil and soybean oil deodorizer distillate, finding significant effects on physicochemical parameters and indicating SBO-DD as a rich source of sterols and a potential resource for biodiesel production.
The present study aimed to evaluate the impact of industrial processing (neutralization/degumming, bleaching, and deodorization) on physicochemical characteristics of soybean oil and soybean oil deodorizer distillate (SBO-DD) collected from two different industries. The substantial impact of processing was observed on all physicochemical parameters except the iodine value (IV) and saponification value (SV). Gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analytical techniques were used for the quantification of individual fatty acids, sterols, and 3-monochloropropane diol (3-MCPD) ester. Among the fatty acids, palmitic and linoleic acids were present at higher concentrations in all processing stages. Among sterols, beta-sitosterol was found to be higher (25.65 mu g/g) in crude soybean oil and reduced to 16.44 mu g/g after processing till the final deodorization stage. 3-MCPD ester was developed during the neutralization/degumming process and further increased during bleaching and deodorization up to 315 mu g/kg, respectively. SBO-DD was found to be a rich source of total and individual sterols as compared to crude or processed soybean oil. High free fatty acid (FFA) level in deodorizer distillate indicated that SBO-DD is a potential source of biodiesel production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据