4.2 Article

Gene Expression Profile of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors (VEGFs) and Platelet-derived Growth Factors (PDGFs) in the Normal Cornea

期刊

IN VIVO
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 805-813

出版社

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12321

关键词

Key Words; Angiogenesis; TaqMan array; platelet derived growth factor; vascular endothelial growth factor

资金

  1. Doctoral School of Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania
  2. Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara Romania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on gene expression profile of normal pig cornea revealed the lack of VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 gene expression, while MK2 and AKT1 genes were significantly overexpressed. Multiple genes in the PDGF pathway were also found to be overexpressed, indicating the avascular state of the cornea is related to the down-regulation of growth factor receptors.
Background/Aim: Angiogenic growth factors expression is not known in the normal cornea. The aim was to study corneal gene expression profile of VEGF and PDGF pathways influencing the avascular state of cornea. Materials and Methods: cDNA synthesis was performed from mRNA extracted from five fresh pig corneas followed by cDNA synthesis and analysis of VEGF and PDGF pathways by TaqMan Array gene expression profile. Results: Normal pig cornea lacks VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 gene expression. MK2 and AKT1 genes were significantly overexpressed (p=0.000684, p=0.050995, respectively). Six PDGF pathway genes were overexpressed: TIAM1 (p=0.047), PIK3CA (p=0.00005), IKBKG (p=0.000006), PAK4 (p=0.034), RAC1 (p=0.000006 and PTGS2, p=0.00375). PDGF A was up regulated, but not with a statistical significance (p=0.79911), while PDGFR alpha was down-regulated and PDGFR beta was not expressed. Conclusion: Normal cornea avascularity is given by growth factor receptors down-regulation. Rapid corneal neovascularisation is induced by activation of the main angiogenic growth factors that induce angiogenic cascade and vessel recruitment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据