4.7 Article

Metabolomics reveals the within-plant spatial effects of shading on tea plants

期刊

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 317-330

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa127

关键词

flavonoid and amino acid metabolism; leaf position; shading; tea quality; untargeted metabolomics

类别

资金

  1. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [Y2020PT08]
  2. Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Special Economic Animals & Plants, Ministry of Agriculture, P. R. China [Y2018PT14]
  3. Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System Ministry of Agriculture of China [CARS19]
  4. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences through Agricultural Sciences Innovation Project [CAAS-ASTIP-2017-TRICAAS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides insights into the spatial effects of shading on tea plants, highlighting the potential for improving tea quality through cultivation measures that enhance plant shading. By analyzing the metabolome in different parts of tea shoots under shading conditions, it was found that shading led to changes in the ratio of polyphenols to amino acids and levels of galloylated catechins, with differential responses observed among various metabolites in the young shoot tissues. The study also revealed spatial redistribution of carbon and nitrogen resources within the plant in response to shading treatments.
It is well known that green tea made from fully developed leaves located at the base of young shoots is of lower quality than that made from the still developing leaves located on the top of the shoot. It has additionally been shown that plant shading can significantly improve green tea quality. Here, we aimed to get more insight into the effects of shading on the overall metabolome in different parts of the tea shoots. To do this, field-grown tea plants were shaded by coverage with either a straw layer or a black net, both blocking the daylight intensity for more than 90%. Both the first (i.e. still developing) leaf and the fourth (i.e. fully developed) leaf, as well as the stem of young shoots were harvested and subjected to complementary untargeted metabolomics approaches, using accurate mass LC-Orbitrap-Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS) for profiling both semi-polar and lipid-soluble compounds and GC-TOF-MS for profiling polar compounds. In total, 1419 metabolites were detected. Shading resulted in a decreased ratio of polyphenols to amino acids (which improves the quality of green tea) and lower levels of galloylated catechins in the shoots. The positive effect of shading on the amino acid/catechin ratio was more pronounced in the fully developed (fourth) than in the developing (first) leaves. Furthermore, many metabolites, especially organic acids, carbohydrates and amino acids, showed differential or opposite responses to the shading treatments between the three shoot tissues investigated, suggesting a within-plant spatial regulation or transport/redistribution of carbon and nitrogen resources between the tissues of the growing young shoots. This work provides new insight into the spatial effects of shading on tea plants, which could further help to increase tea quality by improving cultivation measures for plant shading. Highlights Using complementary untargeted metabolomics approaches, 1419 metabolites has been detected in three young tea shoot tissues (stem, first and fourth leaves) and their responses to two plant shading treatments determined. In contrast to its marked increase in both first and fourth leaves, the key tea quality-related amino acid theanine significantly decreased in the stems under shading. The positive effect of shading on the amino acid/catechin ratio was more pronounced in the fully developed (fourth) than in the young still-developing (first) leaves. Differences in shading-induced changes in metabolites (e.g. organic acids, carbohydrates and amino acids) between the three young shoot tissues (suggest a within-plant spatial redistribution of carbon and nitrogen resources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据