4.6 Article

Magnetically induced optical transparency in a plasmon-exciton system

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 103, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.053706

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0301200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11675058, 11705131, U1504111, 11875029, 11574104]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST) [2018KFYYXJJ037]
  4. Science Research Funds for Wuhan Institute of Technology [K201744]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hybrid system of metal nanoparticles and semiconductor quantum dots interacting with a Faraday magnetic field shows unique optical properties, which can be utilized in designing sensitive on-chip devices.
Plasmonic structures such as metal nanoparticles (MNPs) provide a promising way to explore and control light in a solid-state environment. Here, we study a hybrid system composed of a localized surface plasmon mode of a MNP interacting with a semiconductor quantum dot (QD) subject to a Faraday magnetic field. The MNP-QD system is driven by an externally applied probe laser field and then its scattering photons are detected in the far field. To this end, employing a full quantum optical model, we theoretically calculate and demonstrate the scattering spectrum of the system via a combination of analytical and numerical techniques with realistic parameters. It is found that the applied magnetic field can be utilized to efficiently regulate and control the scattering line shapes. In particular, a class of optical transparency is induced in the scattering spectrum of the plasmon-excition (plexcitonic) system that we refer to as magnetically induced plexcitonic transparency. At the same time, a sharp double-Fano resonance profile is generated in the presence of the magnetic field. The predicted features of the spectra have potential applications in designing sensitive on-chip devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据