4.3 Article

Influence of Apical Clearance on Mini-Scleral Lens Settling, Clinical Performance, and Corneal Thickness Changes

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000266

关键词

Scleral lenses; Settling; Apical clearance; Corneal edema; Hypoxia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to define the timing and magnitude of scleral contact lens settling, the factors influencing settling, and to examine whether the amount of apical clearance has an impact on clinical performance or is associated with hypoxia-induced corneal changes. Methods: Eleven patients (22 eyes) with keratoconus were fitted with a mini-scleral lens (Esclera, Brazil). Three different lenses with successively greater sagittal depths were applied to achieve 3 levels of initial apical clearance: 100 to 200 mu m (low), 200 to 300 mu m (medium), and greater than 300 mu m (high). Corneal apical clearance was measured at 15 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hr with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Central corneal thickness was measured with OCT and Pentacam, in the morning and immediately after removal of the contact lens. Results: Mean settling was 26.8 +/- 18.8 mu m (42.7%) at 1 hr, 39.5 +/- 26.5 mu m (62.9%) at 2 hr, 50.7 +/- 31.6 mu m (80.8%) at 4 hr, 57.4 +/- 34.6 mu m (91.4%) at 6 hr, and 62.8 +/- 38.4 mu m (100%) at 8 hr. Settling rate was significantly lower in low apical clearance group (P = 0.01). The smaller diameter lenses settled more (P = 0.03). There was a slight statistically significant increase of 1.3% in central corneal thickness measured with OCT (P = 0.03). Central corneal thickness measured with Pentacam at three locations increased slightly (P = 0.001). Settling showed significant intrasubject and intersubject variations. The amount of corneal swelling and comfort scores did not differ significantly according to apical clearance. Conclusions: The average amount of settling was 62.8 mu m after 8 hr, 80% of which occurred during the first 4 hr. Slight corneal swelling (1.3%) occurred after 8 hr of wear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据