4.6 Article

Assessment of patient-reported outcome and quality of life improvement following surgery for epiphora

期刊

EYE
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 1664-1671

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2017.120

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To assess and compare the subjective improvement in symptoms and quality of life in adult patients who underwent commonly performed oculoplastic surgical interventions to treat epiphora. Materials and methods A prospective study was undertaken involving all adult patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), lid tightening (lateral tarsal strip or lateral wedge resection), and punctoplasty surgery at our institution. We assessed severity of epiphora preoperatively using the Munk score. At 3 months postoperatively, all patients were sent postal questionnaires comprising of Munk score, ` social impact score' from validated Lac-Q questionnaire ranging from 0 (no impact) to 5 (maximal negative impact) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) score, ranging from -100 (maximal detriment) to + 100 (maximal benefit). Results A total of 134 questionnaires were sent with an overall response rate of 74.6%. For the purpose of data analysis, patients were divided into four groups: DCR, lid tightening, punctoplasty, and combined group (lid tightening plus punctoplasty). There was statistically significant improvement in subjective epiphora postoperatively, as assessed by Munk score (P<0.001) in all groups. The total GBI scores were + 42.67 (95% CI: 33.42-51.91) for DCR, + 19.65 (95% CI: 10.33-28.97) for lid tightening, + 16.06 (95% CI: 2.65-29.48) for punctoplasty, and + 26.53 (95% CI: 13.15-39.90) for the combined group, demonstrating a positive change in health status for all groups. There was negative correlation between total GBI and post-operative Munk scores (r=-0.58, P<0.001), and positive correlation between Lac-Q and Munk scores (r= 0.65, P<0.001). Conclusion Patients derived significant improvement in symptoms and health-related quality of life benefit following all surgical interventions for epiphora.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据