4.4 Article

Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma treated with cytoreductive surgery followed or not by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: results from a large multicentric cohort

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 805-814

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1903585

关键词

Multicystic mesothelioma; cytoreductive surgery; CRS; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; HIPEC; fertility

资金

  1. National Institute of Cancer (INCa)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed MCPM patients treated with CRS from the French RENAPE database between 1999 and 2019. The study found that HIPEC after complete surgery can reduce the risk of recurrence, but the difference was not statistically significant. Twenty-two percent of patients experienced severe post-operative adverse events, leading to reoperation. The majority of patients with a desire for childbearing were successful after laparoscopic-CRS-HIPEC surgery.
Background Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (MCPM) is a rare, slowly growing, condition prone to recur after surgery. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) added to complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) remains controversial and difficult to assess. As patients are mostly reproductive age women, surgical approach, and fertility considerations are important aspects of the management. This observational retrospective review aimed to accurate treatment strategy reflections. Methods The RENAPE database (French expert centers network) was analyzed over a 1999-2019 period. MCPM patients treated with CRS were included. A special focus on HIPEC, mini-invasive approach, and fertility considerations was performed. Results Overall 60 patients (50 women) were included with a median PCI of 10 (4-14) allowing 97% of complete surgery, followed by HIPEC in 82% of patients. A quarter of patients had a laparoscopic approach. Twelve patients (20%) recurred with a 3-year recurrence free survival of 84.2% (95% confidence interval 74.7-95.0). The hazard of recurrence was numerically reduced among patients receiving HIPEC, however, not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.41, 0.12-1.42, p = 0.200). A severe post-operative adverse event occurred in 22% of patients with five patients submitted to a subsequent reoperation. Among four patients with a childbearing desire, three were successful (two had a laparoscopic-CRS-HIPEC and one a conventional CRS without HIPEC). Conclusion MCPM patients treatment should aim at a complete CRS. The intraoperative treatment options as laparoscopic approach, fertility function sparing and HIPEC should be discussed in expert centers to propose the most appropriate strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据