4.6 Article

Two Novel Algorithms for Low-Rank Matrix Completion Problem

期刊

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 892-896

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LSP.2021.3074832

关键词

Uncertainty; Minimization; Signal processing algorithms; Motion pictures; Measurement; Prediction algorithms; Approximation algorithms; Low-rank matrix; nuclear norm minimization; matrix completion; coherent and incoherent matices

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes two algorithms to recover coherent and incoherent low-rank matrices, where a limited sampling budget is used to sample the most informative elements based on uncertainty information metric. Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed algorithms compared to traditional methods.
Low-rank matrix completion has been exploited in many signal processing problems over the past few years. It has been shown that nuclear norm minimization can retrieve such low-rank matrices via uniform sampling under coherence conditions. However, in many applications such as the Netflix problem, the low-rank matrix is not coherent, hence nuclear norm minimization is unable to solve the problem because of uniform sampling. To overcome this issue, we propose two algorithms to recover both coherent and incoherent low-rank matrices. In the first algorithm, it is assumed that we have a limited sampling budget that is associated with the available number of samples. Using a portion of the sampling budget, we propose an Uncertainty Information (UI) metric to quantify the uncertainty that we have for each element and consider the elements with the most uncertainty as the most informative elements to sample. Finally, the simulations results are performed to investigate the performance of the proposed algorithms and show their superiority to conventional approaches such as nuclear norm minimization Candes and Recht, 2009 and two-phase sampling algorithm Chen et al. 2015.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据