4.5 Article

Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 788-797

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1656

关键词

Apis mellifera; Fabaceae; flower color diversity; plant-pollinator interactions; pollination; reflectance spectra; seasonally dry vegetation; visual system

资金

  1. PELD-CRSC
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [201350155-0, 2010/51307-0, 2007/59779-6, 2009/54208-6]
  3. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [400717/2013-1]
  4. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  5. Ibero-American Program on Science and Technology for Development RED CYTED-SEPODI [417RT0527]
  6. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  7. UNESP CAPES-Print Program
  8. FAPESP [2017/15152-1, 2018/11985-1, 2015/10754-8, 2018/21646-0]
  9. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) of Brazil
  10. CNPq [140534/2020-2, 311820/2018-2]
  11. Spanish MINECO [CGL2015-63827]
  12. CNPq-PDJ [161293/2015-8]
  13. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [15/10754-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flower color is a primary attractant for pollinators and varies depending on the vegetation type and background, influencing the perception of flower color by pollinators like bees. Natural background colors affect bee discrimination of flower colors, highlighting the importance of considering environmental factors in analyzing flower color signals.
PREMISE: Flower color is a primary pollinator attractant and generally adjusted to the cognitive system of the pollinators. The perception of flower color depends on the visual system of pollinators and also on environmental factors such as light conditions and the background against which flowers are displayed. METHODS: Using bee-pollinated Fabaceae species as a model, we analyzed flower color diversity and compared flower color signals considering both the standard green and the natural leaf background of two tropical seasonally dry vegetations-a mountain rupestrian grassland (campo rupestre) and a woody savanna (cerrado)-compared to a nontropical Mediterranean shrubland. RESULTS: By using natural background, bees discriminated color for 58% of the flowers in the campo rupestre and for only 43% in cerrado. Both vegetations were surpassed y 75% of bee color discrimination in : Mediterranean vegetation. Chromatic contrast and purity were similar among the three vegetation types. Green contrast and brightness were similar between the tropical vegetations but differed from the Mediterranean shrubland. Green contrast differences were lost when using a standard green background, and most variables (purity, green contrast, and brightness) differed according to the background (natural or standard green) in all vegetations. CONCLUSIONS: The natural background influenced bee perception of flower color regardless of vegetation. The background of the campo rupestre promoted green contrast for flowers, ensuring flower detection by pollinators and, along with bees, may also act as a selective pressure driving the diversity of flower colors in Fabaceae species. We highlight the importance of considering the natural background coloration when analyzing flower color signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据