4.8 Article

Revealing the role of the cathode-electrolyte interface on solid-state batteries

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 1392-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-01016-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. US Army [CERL W9132T-19-2-0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interfaces play crucial roles in the performance of secondary solid-state batteries, and the crystallography and morphology of thick cathodes directly impact long-term performance. Minimizing interfacial area is key to understanding interface instabilities and improving cell performance. Dense and thick cathodes are suggested for increasing energy density and stability of solid-state batteries.
Interfaces play crucial, but still poorly understood, roles in the performance of secondary solid-state batteries. Using crystallographically oriented and highly faceted thick cathodes, the impact of cathode crystallography and morphology on long-term performance is investigated. Interfaces have crucial, but still poorly understood, roles in the performance of secondary solid-state batteries. Here, using crystallographically oriented and highly faceted thick cathodes, we directly assess the impact of cathode crystallography and morphology on the long-term performance of solid-state batteries. The controlled interface crystallography, area and microstructure of these cathodes enables an understanding of interface instabilities unknown (hidden) in conventional thin-film and composite solid-state electrodes. A generic and direct correlation between cell performance and interface stability is revealed for a variety of both lithium- and sodium-based cathodes and solid electrolytes. Our findings highlight that minimizing interfacial area, rather than its expansion as is the case in conventional composite cathodes, is key to both understanding the nature of interface instabilities and improving cell performance. Our findings also point to the use of dense and thick cathodes as a way of increasing the energy density and stability of solid-state batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据