4.6 Article

A mixed ion-electron conducting carbon nanotube ionogel to efficiently harvest heat from both a temperature gradient and temperature fluctuation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 23, 页码 13588-13596

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta02869c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Singapore [R284-000-228-112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing flexible mixed ion-electron thermoelectric converters consisting of ionogels made of ionic liquid and single-walled carbon nanotubes, waste heat can be efficiently converted into electricity, with significantly improved performance compared to traditional thermoelectric generators.
It is of significance to develop efficient heat-to-electricity conversion technology for sustainable development because of the abundant waste heat on Earth. Waste heat can induce a temperature gradient in the environment, and the temperature fluctuates with time. Thermoelectric (TE) generators based on the Seebeck effect of electronic conductors under a temperature gradient can directly convert heat into electricity, but their performance is still too low for large-scale practical application. Here, we report mixed ion-electron thermoelectric converters (MTECs) using flexible quasi-solid ionogels consisting of an ionic liquid (IL), gelatin and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs). The ionogels are ionically and electronically conductive due to the ionic liquid and SWNTs, respectively, and they have very low thermal conductivity. The MTECs can convert heat into electricity from both the temperature fluctuation causing the ion accumulation variation of the ionic liquids and the temperature gradient inducing the Seebeck effect of SWNTs. The ratio of the optimal output power density (P) of the MTECs to the thermal conductivity (lambda) of the active material is used to evaluate the TE performance. The P/lambda value of the MTECs with optimal SWNT loading in the ionogel is about 7.7 times of that of the control TE generators with a SWNT film.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据