4.6 Article

Tuning the degradation activity and pathways of chlorinated organic pollutants over CeO2 catalyst with acid sites: synergistic effect of Lewis and Bronsted acid sites

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 11, 期 13, 页码 4581-4595

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cy00626f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFC1806102]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21976172]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Fujian Province [2020Y01010042]
  4. FJIRSM&IUE Joint Research Fund [RHZX-2018-002]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences from the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-DQC022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The introduction of Lewis acid sites enhances the redox capacity of CeO2, while surface Bronsted acid sites promote the hydrolysis degradation of chlorobenzene (CB). The optimal catalyst, S-Ce0.7Zr0.3O2, with abundant surface Lewis and Bronsted acid sites, shows stable activity with low chlorine by-product selectivity and high CB conversion.
Enhancing the surface acidity has been seen as an effective strategy to optimize the performance of catalysts for the degradation of chlorinated volatile organic compounds (CVOCs). Herein, a series of catalysts are constructed by introducing Lewis and Bronsted acid sites into the skeleton surface of three-dimensional ordered macroporous (3DOM) CeO2. By a systematic study, we find that the introduction of Lewis acid sites can enhance the redox capacity of CeO2, while the surface Bronsted acid sites of the material promote chlorobenzene (CB) degradation through hydrolysis that is an effective degradation route to generate less chlorinated organic by-products. The optimal S-Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 with both abundant surface Lewis and Bronsted acid sites presents a stable activity and only 1.2% Cl-2 selectivity with similar to 90% CB conversion at 410 degrees C for 24 h. This work reveals the different roles and synergistic effects of Lewis and Bronsted acid sites to develop environmentally friendly CVOC combustion catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据