4.6 Article

Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines show high tolerance for siRNA-mediated CDK1 knockdown

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 2081-2094

出版社

E-CENTURY PUBLISHING CORP

关键词

CDK1; laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC); gene silencing; cell cycle checkpoint

类别

资金

  1. Polish National Science Center [2013/11/N/NZ2/02483]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CDK1 is essential for cell proliferation and cycle regulation, making it a potential target in cancer therapy. Knockdown of CDK1 in LSCC cell lines did not impact cell proliferation and viability, with analysis showing enriched pathways in differentially expressed genes. Some genes, such as CDK6, CALD1, and FYN, are potentially dependent on CDK1.
Alterations of the cell cycle checkpoints lead to uncontrolled cell growth and result in tumorigenesis. One of the genes essential for cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation is CDK1. This makes it a potential target in cancer therapy. In our previous study we have shown upregulation of this gene in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Here we analyze the impact of siRNA-mediated CDK1 knockdown on cell proliferation and viability, measured with cell growth monitoring and colorimetric test (CCK8 assay), respectively. We proved that a reduction of CDK1 expression by more than 50% has no effect on these cellular processes in LSCC cell lines (n=2). Moreover, using microarrays, we analyzed global gene expression deregulation in these cell lines after CDK1 knockdown. We searched for enriched ontologies in the group of identified 137 differentially expressed genes (>2-fold change). Within this group we found 3 enriched pathways: protein binding (GO:0005515), mitotic nuclear division (GO:0007067) and transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway (GO:0007169) and a group of 11 genes encoding proteins for which interaction with CDK1 was indicated with the use of bioinformatic tools. Among these genes we propose three: CDK6, CALD1 and FYN as potentially dependent on CDK1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据