4.7 Article

Constructing cationic covalent organic frameworks by a post-function process for an exceptional iodine capture via electrostatic interactions

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS
卷 5, 期 14, 页码 5463-5470

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1qm00416f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1804126, U1804129, 21671205, 21805110, 21771164]
  2. Support Program of Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talent of Zhongyuan [204200510014]
  3. Key Projects of Science and Technology of Henan Province [212102210208]
  4. Zhongyuan University of Technology start-up grant
  5. Shanghai Pujiang Program [19PJ1410400]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [20ZR1464000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two cationic covalent organic frameworks were synthesized for exceptional iodine capture, with one material showing a high iodine uptake value surpassing most neutral COFs and ionic porous adsorbents. The improved iodine uptake capacities of cationic COFs were attributed to electrostatic interactions between COF networks and iodine molecules. This research demonstrates an effective strategy for constructing cationic COF materials for iodine capture.
With the continuous development of nuclear energy, radioactive iodine in nuclear waste is becoming increasingly harmful to the environment and human health. Herein, we synthesized two cationic covalent organic frameworks (C-TP-PDA-COFs and C-TP-BPDA-COFs) via a post-function process for an exceptional iodine capture. Compared to that of neutral COFs, the iodine uptake capacities of cationic COFs were improved 1.3 times due to electrostatic interactions between COF networks and iodine molecules. Interestingly, C-TP-BPDA-COF possessed high-density ionic units to realize a high iodine uptake value of 6.11 g g(-1), which is higher than most neutral COFs and ionic porous adsorbents. This study demonstrates an effective way to construct cationic COF materials and further employ them as scaffolds for iodine capture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据