4.7 Article

A comparative study of robust efficiency analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis with imprecise data

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 28-38

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.043

关键词

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA); Performance measurement; Robust efficiency analysis; Perfect efficiency; Potential efficiency; Imprecise data

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of Chinaunder [61174149, 71571128]
  2. Construction Plan of Scientific Research Innovation Team for colleges and universities in Sichuan Province [15TD0004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data Envelopment Analysis gauges the performance of operating entities in the best scenario for input and output multipliers. Robust efficiency analysis is a conservative approach that is concerned with an assured level of performance for an entity across all possible multiplier scenarios. In this study, we extend the robust efficiency analysis procedure to the situation where precise information on some input and output data is unavailable. Perfect efficiency analysis and potential efficiency analysis methods are developed to determine, respectively, the lower and upper bounds of an entity's robust efficiency rating. The concepts of robust efficiency are expanded to classify entities in consideration into three groups: perfectly robust efficient, potentially robust efficient and robust inefficient. Two approaches are presented to convert robust efficiency analysis models into linear programs. It is claimed that Data Envelopment Analysis and robust efficiency analysis together provide a comprehensive picture of an entity's relative efficiency. A computational experiment is conducted to compare the traditional efficiency analysis method with robust efficiency analysis in the presence of imprecise data. The results illustrate that perfect efficiency analysis exhibits a superior power of discrimination than potential efficiency analysis and that an entity recommended by perfect efficiency analysis has a satisfactory average performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据