4.6 Article

Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Language Recovery in Poststroke Survivors With Aphasia: An Updated Meta-analysis

期刊

NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 680-691

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15459683211011230

关键词

aphasia; transcranial magnetic stimulation; meta-analysis; stroke; systematic review

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871847, 81702232, 81672261]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2017A030313493]
  3. Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515011106]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Key Project of Guangzhou [201803010119]
  5. Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC2001603]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The meta-analysis of 14 randomized controlled trials revealed that LF-rTMS has positive and significant effects on language function poststroke in both short-term (Hedges' g = 0.65; P < .05) and long-term (Hedges' g = 0.46; P < .05). LF-rTMS for 20 minutes per day over 10 days showed the largest effect size (Hedges' g = 1.02; P < .05), and significantly improved language performance in the chronic stage after stroke (Hedges' g = 0.55; P < .05).
The effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) on treating poststroke aphasia (PSA) remain inconclusive. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LF-rTMS on language function poststroke and determine potential factors that may affect treatment effects. Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the effects of LF-rTMS on language performance poststroke. We adopted fixed- and random-effects models to estimate intervention effects, which were represented by the Hedges' g and 95% CIs. Subgroup analyses regarding several factors potentially influencing the effects of LF-rTMS on language recovery were also conducted. A total of 14 RCTs involving 374 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed the positive and significant effects of LF-rTMS on language function, both short-term (Hedges' g = 0.65; P < .05) and long-term (Hedges' g = 0.46; P < .05). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that LF-rTMS for 20 minutes per day over 10 days yielded the largest effect size (Hedges' g = 1.02; P < .05) and that LF-rTMS significantly improved language performance in the chronic stage after stroke (Hedges' g = 0.55; P < .05). Patients with different native languages might have diverse responses to LF-rTMS treatment efficacy. Additionally, there were significant improvements in language subtests, including naming, repetition, comprehension, and writing. Overall, this updated meta-analysis demonstrated that LF-rTMS has significant positive effects on PSA, with moderate treatment effects. It provides additional evidence to support LF-rTMS as a promising complementary therapy to promote language recovery in PSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据