4.6 Article

A general QSPR protocol for the prediction of atomic/inter-atomic properties: a fragment based graph convolutional neural network (F-GCN)

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 23, 页码 13242-13249

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp00677k

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Government [v15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a fragment-based graph convolutional neural network (F-GCN) was developed for the prediction of atomic/inter-atomic properties. The results were comparable to experimental measurements, with reduced computational cost. F-GCN showed efficient structural prediction capabilities and performed well in tests.
In this study, a general quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) protocol, fragment based graph convolutional neural network (F-GCN), was developed for the prediction of atomic/inter-atomic properties. We applied this novel artificial intelligence (AI) tool in predictions of NMR chemical shifts and bond dissociation energies (BDEs). The obtained results were comparable to experimental measurements, while the computational cost was substantially reduced, with respect to pure density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The two important features of F-GCN can be summarised as: first, it could utilise different levels of molecular fragments for atomic/inter-atomic information extraction; second, the designed architecture is also open to include additional descriptors for a more accurate solution of the local environment at atomic level, making itself more efficient for structural solutions. And during our test, the averaged prediction error of H-1 NMR chemical shifts is as small as 0.32 ppm, and the error of C-H BDE estimation is 2.7 kcal mol(-1). Moreover, we further demonstrated the applicability of this developed F-GCN model via several challenging structural assignments. The success of the F-GCN in atomic and inter-atomic predictions also indicates an essential improvement of computational chemistry with the assistance of AI tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据