4.6 Article

Green synthesis of ZnO coated hybrid biochar for the synchronous removal of ciprofloxacin and tetracycline in wastewater

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 30, 页码 18483-18492

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ra01130h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preparation of biochar from kaolinite and coconut husk, activated with HCl and KOH via microwave technique, showed efficient removal of ciprofloxacin and tetracycline from water. The adsorption capacities and kinetic models for the two contaminants varied among the different biochar materials, indicating their potential for water treatment.
Preparation of biochar from kaolinite and coconut husk (KCB) and further activated with HCl (KCB-A) and KOH (KCB-B) via a microwave technique for the remediation of ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tetracycline (TET) from water was carried out. Characterization using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction showed the successful synthesis of functionalized biochars. Batch adsorption experiments demonstrated the potential of the adsorbents for fast and efficient removal of CIP and TET from solution. The adsorption capacities were found to be 71, 140 and 229 mg g(-1) for CIP and 118, 117 and 232 mg g(-1) for TET removal on KCB, KCB-A and KCB-B, respectively. For KCB, KCB-B and KCB-B, CIP adsorption best followed the pseudo second order kinetic model (PSOM), pseudo first order kinetic model (PFOM) and intraparticle diffusion (IDP) respectively. TET adsorption followed PSOM for KCB, IPD for KCB-B and PFOM for KCB-A. CIP adsorption on KCB, KCB-A and KCB-B best fit the Temkin, Langmuir and Brouers-Sotolongo isotherms, respectively, and TET adsorption on KCB best fit Brouers-Sotolongo while KCB-A and KCB-B best fit Langmuir-Freundlich. Adsorption of both contaminants was thermodynamically feasible showing that these materials are excellent adsorbents for the treatment of pharmaceuticals in water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据