4.7 Article

Blunted PTH response to vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency and colorectal neoplasia risk

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 40, 期 5, 页码 3305-3313

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.10.057

关键词

Magnesium deficiency; Parathyroid hormone; Vitamin D; Colorectal neoplasia

资金

  1. US National Cancer Institute [U01 CA182364]
  2. Vanderbilt Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer (MAGEC) training program - US National Cancer Institute [R25/T32 CA160056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optimal 25(OH)D levels are associated with a significantly reduced risk of colorectal cancer, particularly among women. Individuals with BPRVID are at higher risks of incident adenoma and colorectal cancer compared to those with HPRVID, especially among women. Treatment strategies should be tailored based on individuals' different response types.
Background & aims: In contrast to many observational studies, large-scale randomized trials do not support the protective role of vitamin D for the prevention of colorectal neoplasia. However, in previous studies, individuals with blunted parathyroid hormone (PTH) response to vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency (BPRVID), were not differentiated from those with high PTH response to vitamin D insufficiency/ deficiency (HPRVID). Individuals with BPRVID are responsive to magnesium treatment, particularly treatment of magnesium plus vitamin D while those with HPRVID are responsive to vitamin D treatment. We prospectively compared these two distinct groups (i.e. BPRVID and HPRVID) for risk of incident adenoma, metachronous adenoma, and incident colorectal cancer (CRC) Methods: Three nested case-control studies in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) Screening Trial. Results: We found optimal 25(OH)D levels were associated with a significantly reduced risk of CRC, primarily among women. The associations between 25(OH)D and CRC risk significantly differed by PTH levels, particularly among women. Compared to individuals with optimal levels for both 25(OH)D and PTH, all others were at an elevated risk of incident CRC, primarily in women. We found those with BPRVID had 2.56-fold significantly increased risk of CRC compared to 1.65-fold non-significantly increased risk for those with HPRVID. Among women, we observed those with BPRVID had 4.79 -6.25-fold significantly increased risks of incident CRC and adenoma whereas those with HPRVID had 3.65-fold significantly increased risk of CRC. Conclusions: Individuals with BPRVID are at higher risks of incident adenoma and CRC compared to those with HPRVID, particularly among women. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据