4.3 Article

Essentials of a new clinical practice guidance on familial hypercholesterolaemia for physicians

期刊

INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 769-779

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imj.15327

关键词

familial hypercholesterolaemia; guidance; care; management; adults; prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common, heritable and preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease, and new clinical practice recommendations aim to enhance the care of patients with FH by focusing on detection, diagnosis, management, and treatment. The core recommendations highlight the importance of risk stratification for personalized treatment plans, and comprehensive implementation science and practice strategies are needed to ensure proper dissemination of the guidance for the benefit of all families with FH.
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common, heritable and preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease. New clinical practice recommendations are presented to assist practitioners in enhancing the care of all patients with FH. Core recommendations are made on the detection, diagnosis, assessment and management of adults, children and adolescents with FH. Management is under-pinned by the precepts of risk stratification, adherence to healthy lifestyles, treatment of non-cholesterol risk factors and appropriate use of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol-lowering therapies including statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. The recommendations need to be utilised using judicious clinical judgement and shared decision-making with patients and families. New government-funded schemes for genetic testing and use of PCSK9 inhibitors, as well as the National Health Genomics Policy Framework, will enable adoption of the recommendations. However, a comprehensive implementation science and practice strategy is required to ensure that the guidance translates into benefit for all families with FH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据