4.6 Review

CRISPR ribonucleoprotein-mediated genetic engineering in plants

期刊

PLANT COMMUNICATIONS
卷 2, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100168

关键词

CRISPR; RNP; genetic engineering; genome editing; transgene free

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Plant Genome Research Program [IOS-1758745, IOS2029889]
  2. U.S. Department of Agriculture Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant Program [2018-33522-28789, 2020-3352232274]
  3. Emergency Citrus Disease Research and Extension Program [2020-70029-33161]
  4. Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research grant [593603]
  5. Syngenta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CRISPR-derived biotechnologies have revolutionized genetic engineering in plants, but still face challenges such as editing efficiency and off-target mutagenesis.
CRISPR-derived biotechnologies have revolutionized the genetic engineering field and have been widely applied in basic plant research and crop improvement. Commonly used Agrobacterium- or particle bombardment-mediated transformation approaches for the delivery of plasmid-encoded CRISPR reagents can result in the integration of exogenous recombinant DNA and potential off-target mutagenesis. Editing efficiency is also highly dependent on the design of the expression cassette and its genomic insertion site. Genetic engineering using CRISPR ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) has become an attractive approach with many advantages: DNA/transgene-free editing, minimal off-target effects, and reduced toxicity due to the rapid degradation of RNPs and the ability to titrate their dosage while maintaining high editing efficiency. Although RNP-mediated genetic engineering has been demonstrated in many plant species, its editing efficiency remains modest, and its application in many species is limited by difficulties in plant regeneration and selection. In this review, we summarize current developments and challenges in RNP-mediated genetic engineering of plants and provide future research directions to broaden the use of this technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据