4.7 Review

International Consensus Guidance for Management of Myasthenia Gravis 2020 Update

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 114-122

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011124

关键词

-

资金

  1. Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study updated the 2016 formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis, with updated recommendations on thymectomy and new recommendations on the use of rituximab, eculizumab, and methotrexate. The consensus guidance developed by international MG experts based on new evidence can provide direction for clinicians caring for MG patients worldwide.
Objective To update the 2016 formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) based on the latest evidence in the literature. Methods In October 2013, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America appointed a Task Force to develop treatment guidance for MG, and a panel of 15 international experts was convened. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used to develop consensus recommendations pertaining to 7 treatment topics. In February 2019, the international panel was reconvened with the addition of one member to represent South America. All previous recommendations were reviewed for currency, and new consensus recommendations were developed on topics that required inclusion or updates based on the recent literature. Up to 3 rounds of anonymous e-mail votes were used to reach consensus, with modifications to recommendations between rounds based on the panel input. A simple majority vote (80% of panel members voting yes) was used to approve minor changes in grammar and syntax to improve clarity. Results The previous recommendations for thymectomy were updated. New recommendations were developed for the use of rituximab, eculizumab, and methotrexate as well as for the following topics: early immunosuppression in ocular MG and MG associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Conclusion This updated formal consensus guidance of international MG experts, based on new evidence, provides recommendations to clinicians caring for patients with MG worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据