4.1 Article

The Unrelenting Non-sporulating Hyphae

期刊

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15176

关键词

non-sporulating hyphae; fungal endogenous endophthalmitis; molds; aspergillus endophthalmitis; diabetes mellitus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 42-year-old male presented with generalized redness and painless blurring of vision in the left eye, with subsequent fever and left leg abscess. Despite multiple treatments including antibiotics and vitrectomy, his left eye vision deteriorated to nonperception of light due to non-sporulating fungal infection.
A 42-year-old man presented with generalized redness in the left eye and painless blurring of vision for four days. He also had a fever and a large left leg abscess for four days prior to the onset of eye symptoms. Visual acuity of the left eye was hand movement with a positive relative afferent pupillary defect. Conjunctiva was injected with chemosis and mild corneal haziness centrally. There was a presence of whitish fibrin covering the pupil and presence of hypopyon with anterior chamber inflammatory cells. The fundoscopic view was obscured by the presence of fibrin in the pupillary area. B-scan ultrasound showed severe vitritis with multiple loculations. He was treated as left eye endogenous endophthalmitis secondary to left leg abscess. He was given multiple intravitreal antibiotic injections together with intravenous ceftazidime and gutt. moxifloxacin. The vitreous specimen did not yield any growth. Incision and drainage were done for the left leg abscess, and yellowish pus was aspirated with negative culture. Trans-pars plana vitrectomy was performed in view of poor clinical response. However, despite that, his left visual acuity dropped to nonperception of light (NPL). The vitreous specimen taken during vitrectomy finally showed non-sporulating fungal hyphae. He was started on oral fluconazole and topical amphotericin B. His left eye remains as NPL. However, his general eye condition improved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据