4.6 Article

Coinage-metal pillarplexes hosts. Insights into host-guest interaction nature and luminescence quenching effects

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 23, 期 30, 页码 15917-15924

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp00849h

关键词

-

资金

  1. FONDECYT [3190335, 1180683, 3190329]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Host-guest chemistry in materials science is advanced by studying coinage-metal pillarplexes, which show significant contributions from van der Waals and electrostatic interactions, particularly influenced by the pi-surface of the organic ligand backbone. The results suggest potential applications of lighter copper counterparts in forming inclusion complexes.
Host-guest chemistry is a relevant issue in materials science, which encourages further development of versatile host structures. Here the particular features of coinage-metal pillarplexes are evaluated towards formation of host-guest aggregates by the inclusion of 1,8-diaminooctane, as characterized for [M-8(L-Me)(2)](4+) (M = Ag, and, Au). The obtained results denotes the main contribution from van der Waals type interaction (50%), followed by a contribution from orbital polarization and electrostatic nature (20% and 30%), involving both orbitalary and electrostatic terms. Throughout the different coinage-metal based hosts (M = Cu, Ag, and Au), a similar interaction energy is found given by the large contribution of the pi-surface from the organic ligand backbone to both van de Waals and electrostatic interactions. This suggests that a similar host structure can be obtained for the lighter copper counterpart, retaining similar how-guest features. Moreoves, the [Au-8(L-Me)(2)](4+) host exhibits inherent luminescent properties, involving the shortening of Au(i)-Au(i) contacts at the excited state, which is partially avoided when the guest is incorporated, accounting for the observed quenching from titration experiments. This results encourages further exploration of coinage metal hosts in the formation of inclusion complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据