4.4 Article

Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure The CASTLE-AF Trial

期刊

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 594-603

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.11.021

关键词

atrial fibrillation; atrial fibrillation burden; heart failure

资金

  1. Biotronik
  2. Abbott
  3. Biosense Webster
  4. Medtronic
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. St. Jude Medical
  7. LivaNova
  8. Wavelet Health
  9. Vytronus
  10. GE Health Care
  11. Siemens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation, the AF burden at 6 months post-ablation is predictive of hard clinical outcomes, while the first recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episode after ablation is not associated with improvement in mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.
OBJECTIVES This subanalysis of the CASTLE-AF (Catheter Ablation vs. Standard Conventional Treatment in Patients With LV Dysfunction and AF) trial aimed to address the association between atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, AF burden, and hard clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with AF. BACKGROUND The CASTLE-AF trial demonstrated the benefit of CA compared to pharmacological treatment in decreasing mortality and CV hospitalizations in patients with AF and HFrEF. However, the impact of AF recurrence and AF burden after ablation on long-term treatment benefit remains unknown. METHODS The CASTLE-AF protocol randomized 363 patients with coexisting HF and AF in a multicenter prospective controlled fashion to catheter ablation (n = 179) versus pharmacological therapy (n = 184). Two hundred eighty patients were included in this subanalysis (as-treated), 128 of them underwent ablation and 152 received pharmacological treatment. All patients had implanted dual chamber or biventricular implantable defibrillators with activated home monitoring capabilities. The individual AF burden was calculated as the percentage of the atrial arrhythmia time per day. RESULTS AF burden at baseline was not predictive of the primary endpoint (p = 0.473) or all-cause mortality (p = 0.446). AF recurrence (defined as any episode >30 s) did not show any relationship with the primary endpoints of mortality and occurrence of HF, irrespective of the treatment arm. An AF burden below 50% after 6 months of catheter ablation, was associated with a significant decrease in primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15 to 0.71; p = 0.014) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.71; p = 0.031). The risk of the primary endpoint or mortality was directly related to a low (< 50%) or high (>= 50%) AF burden at 6 months post-ablation. CONCLUSIONS AF burden at 6 months was predictive of hard clinical outcomes in HF patients with AF. The first recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia episode >30 s after ablation was not associated with improvement in mortality and hospitalization for HF. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据