4.4 Article

Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Across Different Body Mass Index Categories

期刊

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 649-658

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.02.002

关键词

atrial fibrillation; bleeding; obesity; oral anticoagulation; stroke; underweight

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients with atrial fibrillation, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with better safety and effectiveness compared to warfarin across all body mass index (BMI) categories, including BMI <18.5 and >= 40 kg/m(2).
OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) outcomes (vs. warfarin) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) across body mass index (BMI) categories, including >= 40 and <18.5 kg/m(2). BACKGROUND Clinical trials have not systematically tested the fixed DOAC dosing in underweight and morbidly obese patients. METHODS We retrospectively included consecutive patients with nonvalvular AF with CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age >= 75, Diabetes, Stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex) of >= 1 receiving OACs at our hospital system (2010-2018). Patients were categorized into groups 1 (underweight: BMI of <18.5 kg/m(2)), 2 (normal/overweight: BMI of 18.5 to <30 kg/m(2)), 3 (grade 1/2 obesity: BMI of 30 to <40 kg/m(2)), and 4 (grade 3 obesity: BMI of >= 40 kg/m(2)). We further classified patients by DOAC versus warfarin use. Outcomes were ischemic stroke, significant bleeding events (i.e., resulting in hospitalization), and mortality. RESULTS We included 36,094 patients with a mean age of 74 +/- 11 years and CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc of 3.4 +/- 1.5. Groups 1 through 4 included 455 (1.3%), 18,339 (50.8%), 13,376 (37.1%), and 3,924 (10.9%) patients, respectively. DOAC use ranged from 49% to 56%. At 3.8 follow-up years, with multivariable Cox regression, DOACs (vs. warfarin) were associated with lower risk of ischemic stroke, bleeding, and mortality across all BMI groups, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63 to 0.85), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.87), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65 to 0.88), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.87) (p < 0.001 for all) for ischemic stroke; 0.42 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.92), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.19 to 0.89), 0.45 (95% CI: 0.20 to 1.00), and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.94) (p < 0.05 for all) for bleeding; and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.68 to 1.19; p = 0.5), 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.75; p < 0.0001), 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.71; p < 0.0001), and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56 to 0.77; p < 0.0001) for mortality, in groups 1 to 4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In patients with nonvalvular AF, DOACs compared to warfarin were associated with better safety and effectiveness across all BMI categories, including underweight and morbidly obese patients. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据