3.8 Article

Loneliness, worries, anxiety, and precautionary behaviours in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of 200,000 Western and Northern Europeans

期刊

LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-EUROPE
卷 2, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100020

关键词

COVID-19; Pandemic; Public health; Global health; Lockdown; Governmental interventions; Loneliness; Anxiety; Worries; Precautions

资金

  1. VELUX FOUNDATIONS [36336]
  2. Danish National Research Foundation
  3. Danish Regional Committees
  4. Pharmacy Foundation
  5. Egmont Foundation
  6. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation
  7. Health Foundation
  8. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  9. Lundbeck Foundation [195/04, R100-A9193]
  10. Danish Medical Research Council [SSVF 0646, 271-08-0839/06-066023, O602-01042B, 060202738B]
  11. Innovation Fund Denmark [0603-00294B, 09-067124]
  12. Nordea Foundation [02-2013-2014]
  13. Aarhus Ideas [AU R9-A959-13-S804]
  14. University of Copenhagen Strategic Grant (IFSV 2012)
  15. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF-4183-00594, DFF-4183-00152]
  16. Rubicon grant of the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) [45219105]
  17. Department of Public Health (University of Copenhagen)
  18. ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) [ANR-20-COVI-000, ANR-10-COHO-06]
  19. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [20RR052-00]
  20. Inserm (Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale) [C20-26]
  21. Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie (CNAM)
  22. French Ministry of Health
  23. Ministry of Research
  24. Institut national de la sante et de la recherche medicale
  25. French National Research Agency [ANR-11-INBS-0002]
  26. MSD
  27. AstraZeneca
  28. Lundbeck
  29. L'Oreal
  30. French National Research Agency (ANR: Programme Jeune Chercheur
  31. Flash COVID19)
  32. French Institute for Public Health Research-IReSP (TGIR Cohortes)
  33. French Inter-departmental Mission for the Fight against Drugs and Drug Addiction (MILDeCA)
  34. French Institute of Cancer (INCa)
  35. Pfizer Foundation
  36. Nuffield Foundation [WEL/FR-000022583]
  37. MARCH Mental Health Network - Cross-Disciplinary Mental Health Network Plus initiative - UK Research and Innovation [ES/S002588/1]
  38. Wellcome Trust [221400/Z/20/Z, 205407/Z/16/Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This project aimed to compare and analyze the similarities and differences in key mental-health indicators among four Western and Northern European countries during the early stages of the pandemic. Findings revealed that younger individuals and those with a history of mental illness reported higher levels of loneliness across all four countries, while COVID-19-related worries decreased during the gradual reopening phases.
Background: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments around the world instituted various public-health measures. Our project aimed to highlight the most significant similarities and differences in key mental-health indicators between four Western and Northern European countries, and identify the population subgroups with the poorest mental-health outcomes during the first months of the pandemic. Methods: We analysed time-series survey data of 205,084 individuals from seven studies from Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and the UK to assess the impact of the pandemic and associated lockdowns. All analyses focused on the initial lockdown phase (March-July 2020). The main outcomes were loneliness, anxiety, and COVID-19-related worries and precautionary behaviours. Findings: COVID-19-related worries were consistently high in each country but decreased during the gradual reopening phases. While only 7% of the respondents reported high levels of loneliness in the Netherlands, percentages were higher in the rest of the three countries (13-18%). In all four countries, younger individuals and individuals with a history of mental illness expressed the highest levels of loneliness. Interpretation: The pandemic and associated country lockdowns had a major impact on the mental health of populations, and certain subgroups should be closely followed to prevent negative long-term consequences. Younger individuals and individuals with a history of mental illness would benefit from tailored publichealth interventions to prevent or counteract the negative effects of the pandemic. Individuals across Western and Northern Europe have thus far responded in psychologically similar ways despite differences in government approaches to the pandemic. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据