4.5 Review

Aldo-Keto Reductase (AKR) 1C3 inhibitors: a patent review

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS
卷 27, 期 12, 页码 1329-1340

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2017.1379503

关键词

Acute myeloid leukemia; aldo-keto reductase; androgen receptor; baccharin; co-activator; estrenes; 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; indomethacin; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; prostate cancer

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30-ES013508, P01-CA163227]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: AKR1C3 is a drug target in hormonal and hormonal independent malignancies and acts as a major peripheral 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase to yield the potent androgens testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, and as a prostaglandin (PG) F synthase to produce proliferative ligands for the PG FP receptor. AKR1C3 inhibitors may have distinct advantages over existing therapeutics for the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer, breast cancer and acute myeloid leukemia. Area covered: This article reviews the patent literature on AKR1C3 inhibitors using SciFinder which identified inhibitors in the following chemical classes: N-phenylsulfonyl-indoles, N-(benzimidazoylylcarbonyl)-N-( indoylylcarbonyl)- and N-(pyridinepyrrolyl)-piperidines, N-benzimidazoles and N-benzindoles, repurposed nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (indole acetic acids, N-phenylanthranilates and aryl propionic acids), isoquinolines, and nitrogen and sulfur substituted estrenes. The article evaluates inhibitor AKR potency, specificity, efficacy in cell-based and xenograft models and clinical utility. The advantage of bifunctional compounds that either competitively inhibit AKR1C3 and block its androgen receptor (AR) coactivator function or act as AKR1C3 inhibitors and direct acting AR antagonists are discussed. Expert opinion: A large number of potent and selective inhibitors of AKR1C3 have been described however, preclinical optimization, is required before their benefit in human disease can be assessed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据