4.8 Article

Modular Synthesis of a Versatile Double-Allylation Reagent for Complex Diol Synthesis

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 60, 期 29, 页码 16027-16034

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202103435

关键词

allylation; boron; carboboration; catalysis; copper

资金

  1. Indiana University
  2. NIH [R35GM131755]
  3. NSF MRI program [CHE-1726633, CHE-1920026]
  4. Office of the Vice President for Research
  5. Division of Chemistry (CHE), National Science Foundation [NSF/CHE- 1834750]
  6. Division of Materials Research (DMR), National Science Foundation [NSF/CHE- 1834750]
  7. U.S. DOE [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces an efficient, modular, and enantioselective approach towards accessing novel variants of double-allylation reagents via Cu/Pd-catalyzed alkenylation of alkenylboron derivatives. It demonstrates a novel use of allylBdan reagent directly in a stereocontrolled allylation without initial deprotection. These allylation products are utilized in a second intermolecular allylation to access complex diol motifs, signaling the importance and utility of this method in accessing complex structural motifs in a rapid manner.
Double-allylation reagents allow for the construction of highly complex molecules in an expedient fashion. We have developed an efficient, modular, and enantioselective approach towards accessing novel variants of these reagents through Cu/Pd-catalyzed alkenylboration of alkenylboron derivatives. Importantly, we demonstrate novel use of an allylBdan reagent directly in a stereocontrolled allylation without initial deprotection to the boronic ester. These allylation products are employed in a second intermolecular allylation to access complex diol motifs, which has yet to be shown with these types of double-allylation reagents. Overall, the modularity of this approach and the ease in which complex structural motifs can be accessed in a rapid manner signify the importance and utility of this method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据