4.2 Review

Health technology assessment for digital technologies that manage chronic disease: a systematic review

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462321000362

关键词

Health technology assessment; Digital health; Remote monitoring; Evaluation frameworks; Chronic disease

资金

  1. Australian Government
  2. Postgraduate Scholarship in Health Economics (Patient-Centered Care and Outcomes in Chronic Disease) from the University of Sydney, School of Public Health
  3. Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (TAPPC)
  4. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review identified 44 evaluation frameworks, mainly covering issues of clinical effectiveness and safety related to digital health technologies. The DHT-specific content recommended by these frameworks addressed 28 issues from the HTA Core Model and proposed an additional 22 DHT-specific issues not currently included in the model. Current HTA frameworks may not be sufficient for assessing DHTs due to their varied benefit and risk profiles.
Objective A growing number of evaluation frameworks have emerged over recent years addressing the unique benefits and risk profiles of new classes of digital health technologies (DHTs). This systematic review aims to identify relevant frameworks and synthesize their recommendations into DHT-specific content to be considered when performing Health Technology Assessments (HTAs) for DHTs that manage chronic noncommunicable disease at home. Methods Searches were undertaken of Medline, Embase, Econlit, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library (January 2015 to March 2020), and relevant gray literature (January 2015 to August 2020) using keywords related to HTA, evaluation frameworks, and DHTs. Included framework reference lists were searched from 2010 until 2015. The EUNetHTA HTA Core Model version 3.0 was selected as a scaffold for content evaluation. Results Forty-four frameworks were identified, mainly covering clinical effectiveness (n = 30) and safety (n = 23) issues. DHT-specific content recommended by framework authors fell within 28 of the 145 HTA Core Model issues. A further twenty-two DHT-specific issues not currently in the HTA Core Model were recommended. Conclusions Current HTA frameworks are unlikely to be sufficient for assessing DHTs. The development of DHT-specific content for HTA frameworks is hampered by DHTs having varied benefit and risk profiles. By focusing on DHTs that actively monitor/treat chronic noncommunicable diseases at home, we have extended DHT-specific content to all nine HTA Core Model domains. We plan to develop a supplementary evaluation framework for designing research studies, undertaking HTAs, and appraising the completeness of HTAs for DHTs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据