4.6 Article

Monitoring the COVID-19-affected Indonesian seaweed industry using remote sensing data

期刊

MARINE POLICY
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104431

关键词

Agar; Carrageenan; COVID-19; Marine algae; Remote sensing; South Sulawesi; Satellite imagery

资金

  1. Australian Government through the Australia-Indonesia Centre under the Partnership for Australia-Indonesia Research (PAIR) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The seaweed industry in Indonesia has grown rapidly over the past twenty years, benefiting 267,000 coastal households. Accurate information is needed for policy makers to improve smallholder livelihoods without further straining natural resources. Utilizing satellite data and other factors, this paper provides insights on the industry's seasonality and changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluating the data's usefulness for monitoring and informing strategic policy decisions.
The Indonesian seaweed industry has rapidly expanded over the last twenty years and now contributes to the livelihoods of 267,000 coastal households. Policy makers need accurate information from which to base policy that improves the livelihoods of smallholder farmers without further straining natural resource limits. The sustained growth of the sector necessitates means for reporting and monitoring the sector, particularly in the context of COVID-19. This paper uses newly available, high resolution, high frequency satellite data from April 2017 to December 2020 to identify seaweed farming plots and to map the seasonal changes in the industry. This is overlaid with data on environmental factors, prices, and official production statistics to reveal a range of insights into the industry which are obscured by official annual data, such as the seasonality of production and the change in activity since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper evaluates the usefulness of this data for monitoring the industry and informing strategic policy decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据