4.5 Review

Test systems in drug discovery for hazard identification and risk assessment of human drug-induced liver injury

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1341489

关键词

Human; hepatocytes; HepaRG; HepG2; DILI; liver; drug discovery; drug development; hepatobiliary; cytotoxicity; mitochondrial toxicity; cholestasis; immune system; IMI; test systems; endpoints

资金

  1. Mechanism-Based Integrated Systems for the Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury (MIP-DILI) consortium
  2. University of Liverpool, UK (Kevin Park)
  3. Innovative Medicines Initiative Grant [115336]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The liver is an important target for drug-induced toxicities. Early detection of hepatotoxic drugs requires use of well-characterized test systems, yet current knowledge, gaps and limitations of tests employed remains an important issue for drug development. Areas Covered: The current state of the science, understanding and application of test systems in use for the detection of drug-induced cytotoxicity, mitochondrial toxicity, cholestasis and inflammation is summarized. The test systems highlighted herein cover mostly in vitro and some in vivo models and endpoint measurements used in the assessment of small molecule toxic liabilities. Opportunities for research efforts in areas necessitating the development of specific tests and improved mechanistic understanding are highlighted. Expert Opinion: Use of in vitro test systems for safety optimization will remain a core activity in drug discovery. Substantial inroads have been made with a number of assays established for human Drug-induced Liver Injury. There nevertheless remain significant gaps with a need for improved in vitro tools and novel tests to address specific mechanisms of human Drug-Induced Liver Injury. Progress in these areas will necessitate not only models fit for application, but also mechanistic understanding of how chemical insult on the liver occurs in order to identify translational and quantifiable readouts for decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据