4.8 Article

Non-autonomous regulation of germline stem cell proliferation by somatic MPK-1/MAPK activity in C. elegans

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109162

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondation UQTR
  2. FRQ-NT [2018-NC-205752]
  3. FRQ-S [265445, 252405]
  4. NSERC [RGPIN-2019-06863, RGPAS-2019-00017, DGECR-2019-00326]
  5. CIHR [PJT-169138]
  6. CFI [36916]
  7. NSF [DGE-1256259]
  8. NIH [5T32GM007133, R01 GM134119]
  9. NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD010440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ERK/MAPK pathway plays a crucial role in cell proliferation regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans, with different isoforms of MPK-1 having specific effects on germline differentiation and stem cell proliferation. The study suggests a potential non-autonomous role of ERK/MAPK in stem cell proliferation across species and tissue types, with significant clinical implications for cancer and other diseases.
Extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is a major positive regulator of cell proliferation, which is often upregulated in cancer. However, few studies have addressed ERK/MAPK regulation of proliferation within a complete organism. The Caenorhabditis elegans ERK/MAPK ortholog MPK-1 is best known for its control of somatic organogenesis and germline differentiation, but it also stimulates germline stem cell proliferation. Here, we show that the germline-specific MPK-1B isoform promotes germline differentiation but has no apparent role in germline stem cell proliferation. By contrast, the soma-specific MPK-1A isoform promotes germline stem cell proliferation non-autonomously. Indeed, MPK-1A functions in the intestine or somatic gonad to promote germline proliferation independent of its other known roles. We propose that a non-autonomous role of ERK/MAPK in stem cell proliferation may be conserved across species and various tissue types, with major clinical implications for cancer and other diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据