4.2 Article

Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science Global Engagement Task Force Report

期刊

COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

UNIV CALIFORNIA PRESS
DOI: 10.1525/collabra.22968

关键词

inclusion; global diversity; diversity; sips; organizational diversity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SIPS is an organization focused on improving methods and practices in psychological science, acknowledging the need for diversity and global engagement. The Global Engagement Task Force seeks to address issues of inclusion and access for scholars from diverse regions, amid challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and civil unrest.
The Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science (SIPS) is an organization whose mission focuses on bringing together scholars who want to improve methods and practices in psychological science. The organization reaffirmed in June 2020 that [we] cannot do good science without diverse voices, and acknowledged that right now the demographics of SIPS are unrepresentative of the field of psychology, which is in turn unrepresentative of the global population. We have work to do when it comes to better supporting Black scholars and other underrepresented minorities. The purpose of the Global Engagement Task Force, started in January 2020, was to explore suggestions made after the 2019 Annual Conference, held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, around inclusion and access for scholars from regions outside of the United States, Canada, and Western Europe (described in the report as geographically diverse regions), a task complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic and civil unrest in several task force members' countries of residence. This report outlines several suggestions, specifically around building partnerships with geographically diverse open science organizations; increasing SIPS presence at other, more local events; diversifying remote events; considering geographically diverse annual conference locations; improving membership and financial resources; and surveying open science practitioners from geographically diverse regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据