4.6 Review

Clinical experience with drug delivery systems as tools to decrease the toxicity of anticancer chemotherapeutic agents

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 1217-1226

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1276560

关键词

Cancer treatment; chemotherapy toxicity; drug targeting; LDL receptors and cancer; lipid core particles; liposomes; nanoemulsions; polymeric nanoparticles

资金

  1. 1A Research Award from National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brasilia, Brazil)
  2. Foundation for Research Support of the State of Sao Paulo (FAPESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil)
  3. Financier of Studies and Projects (FINEP, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)
  4. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: The toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, resulting from their low pharmacological index, introduces considerable discomfort and risk to cancer patients. Among several strategies to reduce the toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents, targeted drug delivery is the most promising one. Areas covered: Liposomes, micelles, albumin-based, polymeric, dendritic and lipid core nanoparticles have been used as carriers to concentrate anticancer drugs in neoplastic tissues, and clinical studies of those preparations are reviewed. In most clinical studies, drug delivery systems reduced drug toxicity. Lipid core nanoparticles (LDE) that bind to cell lipoprotein receptors have the ability to concentrate in neoplastic tissues and were the first artificial non-liposomal system shown in in vivo studies to possess targeting properties. The toxicity reduction achieved by LDE as vehicle of carmustine, etoposide and paclitaxel was singularly strong. Expert opinion: The reduced toxicity offered by drug delivery systems has expanded treatment population that may benefit from chemotherapy including feeble, overtreated and elderly patients that would otherwise be offered palliative therapy. Drug delivery systems may either prolong the duration of treatments or allow increases in drug dose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据