4.1 Article

Quinone reductase activity is widespread in lichens

期刊

LICHENOLOGIST
卷 53, 期 3, 页码 265-269

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0024282921000190

关键词

detoxification; extracellular redox cycling; hydroxyl radical; survey

资金

  1. University of KwaZulu Natal Research Fund
  2. Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University
  3. Russian Science Foundation [18-14-00198]
  4. Russian government assignment of FRC Kazan Scientific Center of RAS
  5. Russian Science Foundation [18-14-00198] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The occurrence of oxidoreductase enzymes such as tyrosinase, laccase, heme peroxidase, and quinone reductase in lichens was demonstrated, with the latter showing varying activities among different lichen species. Despite the belief that these enzymes play a role in extracellular hydroxyl radical production, this study did not find a correlation between enzyme activities and hydroxyl radical production rates. Possible roles for quinone reductase in lichen biology were discussed.
In our earlier work, we demonstrated that the oxidases tyrosinase (TYR), laccase (LAC), and a heme peroxidase (POX) occur widely in lichens. Here we report on the occurrence of another oxidoreductase enzyme, quinone reductase (QR) (EC 1.6.5.5). While QR has been reported to occur widely in other organisms, there is currently no information on QR activities in lichens. Here we present a survey of QR activity in 14 species of lichens. Results demonstrate that QR activity is readily detectable in all lichen species tested. However, activities vary greatly, with 'jelly' lichens in the genera Collema and Leptogium having the highest activities. QR, LAC and POX are all believed to have a role in extracellular hydroxyl radical production. However, in this study no correlation was found between the activities of these enzymes and the rates at which hydroxyl radicals were produced. Possible roles for QR in lichen biology are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据