4.7 Review

Advances in decontamination of wastewater using biomass-basedcomposites: A critical review

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 784, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147108

关键词

Biomass-based composites; Contaminants; Wastewater treatment; Adsorption; Regeneration

资金

  1. Haryana State Council for Science & Technology, Govt. of Haryana [HCST/RD/2019/1302]
  2. University Grants Commission India, Govt. of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the use of biomass-based composites for contaminant removal from wastewater, highlighting their significant enhancement of adsorption capacity and the study of composite regeneration to tackle solid waste generation issue.
Contaminant removal from wastewater using natural biosorbents has been widely studied as a suitable and environmentally benign alternative for conventional techniques. Currently, researchers are working on various biomass-based composites for wastewater remediation to improve the performance of natural biosorbents. This review takes into focus a wide range of biomass-based composites like hydrogel composites, metal oxide composites, magnetic composites, polymer composites, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene composites, metal organic framework composites (MOFs) and clay composites for the removal of various contaminants from wastewater. It is evident from the literature survey that the composite fabrication involves the modification of morphological and textural features of the biomass which results in significant enhancement of adsorption capacity. Apart from this, regeneration of the used biomass-based composite is also studied in depth in order to overcome the problem of solid waste generation. This review would prove to be beneficial for researchers who are currently focusing on the development of cost-effective, easily available, recyclable biomass-based composites with enhanced adsorption capacities for wastewater treatment. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据