4.3 Review

Development of pneumococcal vaccines over the last 10 years

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 7-17

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1384462

关键词

Invasive pneumococcal disease; non-invasive pneumococcal disease; pneumococcal conjugate vaccine; pneumococcal protein vaccine; pneumococcal vaccines; Streptococcus pneumoniae

资金

  1. World Association of Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid)
  2. Italian Ministry of Health (Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Bando Ricerca Corrente) [2017 850/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Although significant improvements in the prevention of pneumococcal infections have been achieved in recent years, Streptococcus pneumoniae remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. To prevent S. pneumoniae infections, vaccines have been developed for several years. Areas covered: In this review, the most important emerging problems regarding pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) are discussed in addition to the status of new vaccine design and development. Given the medical, social and economic relevance of pneumococcal diseases, the availability of effective and safe vaccines against S. pneumoniae is a key objective of public health. Expert opinion: Protein vaccines using agents different from capsular polysaccharides (CPs) or wholecell vaccines seem to induce a broader immune response than PCVs and theoretically offer definitive solutions, as they can stimulate both humoral and cellular immunity. Moreover, these vaccines, particularly the whole- cell vaccine, are simpler to produce and significantly less expensive. However, the development of these preparations is very far from completion. It is highly likely that for a long time, no new safe and effective pneumococcal vaccines will be available. The best formulation of new pneumococcal vaccines has not been established. Consequently, an effort towards the expanded use of the available vaccines has to be made.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据