4.6 Article

Identifying and exploring the effects of different types of tutor questions in individual online synchronous tutoring in mathematics

期刊

INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 510-522

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1583674

关键词

Individual tutoring; online tutoring; synchronous learning; mathematics; tutor questions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify commonly used question types in online tutoring and explore their effects on conversation intensity, tutoring approach, perceived satisfaction, and perceived learning. The results showed that a mix of open and closed questions used by tutors contributed to increased conversation intensity, but not all question types had significant effects on satisfaction or learning.
Although we know that asking questions is an essential aspect of online tutoring, there is limited research on this topic. The aim of this paper was to identify commonly used direct question types and explore the effects of using these question types on conversation intensity, approach to tutoring, perceived satisfaction and perceived learning. The research setting was individual online synchronous tutoring in mathematics. The empirical data was based on 13,317 logged conversations and a questionnaire. The tutors used a mix of open, more student-centred questions, and closed, more teacher-centred questions. In contrast to previous research, this study provides a more positive account indicating that it is indeed possible to train tutors to focus on asking questions, rather than delivering content. Frequent use of many of the question types contributed to increased conversation intensity. However, there were few question types that were associated with statistically significant effects on perceived satisfaction or learning. There are no silver bullet question types that by themselves led to positive effects on perceived satisfaction and learning. The question types could be used by teachers and teacher students when reflecting on what types of questions they are asking, and what kind of questions they could be asking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据