4.1 Article

Protein Nanofibrils for Sustainable Food-Characterization and Comparison of Fibrils from a Broad Range of Plant Protein Isolates

期刊

ACS FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 1, 期 5, 页码 854-864

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00034

关键词

fava bean; mung bean; lupin; oat; rapeseed; amyloid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant-based protein nanofibrils (PNFs) have been shown to have the potential for use in sustainable food applications and biobased materials. Different plant proteins were found to be able to form PNFs under acidic and heat conditions, with unique features and morphological alterations observed. Purification of the fibril-forming protein component can enhance PNF production for future scaled-up applications.
Protein nanofibrils (PNFs) from plant-based protein sources have great potential for use in new sustainable food applications or biobased materials. Plant-based proteins from seven different sources (fava bean, mung bean, lupin, oat, rapeseed, soybean, and potato) were evaluated here for their ability for forming PNFs and compared with whey protein PNFs. Formation of PNFs was studied under incubation at acidic conditions (pH 2) and heat (85-90 degrees C) for 24-96 h. Presence of PNFs was detected using thioflavin T, circular dichroism spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. The results showed that all plant-based proteins were able to form PNFs. For some of the plant protein isolates in this study, nanofibril formation is reported for the first time. We also describe and compare the distinct features associated with each protein source and the morphological alterations of the nanoscale structures. Finally, we describe how PNF production can be enhanced by purifying the fibril-forming protein component. Taken together, our study suggests that the structural and functional variation within plant protein nanofibrils can be exploited in future scaled-up food or material applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据