4.7 Article

Cosmological consequences of a principle of finite amplitudes

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 103, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.103525

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [CoG 772295]
  2. Fond de recherche du Quebec-Nature et technologies
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that there are significant consequences for early universe models, with eternal inflation and strictly cyclic universes being ruled out. Furthermore, within general relativity, the first phase of evolution cannot be inflationary.
Over 30 years ago, Barrow and Tipler proposed the principle according to which the action integrated over the entire four-manifold describing the universe should be finite. Here we explore the cosmological consequences of a related criterion, namely, that semiclassical transition amplitudes from the early universe up to current field values should be well defined. On a classical level, our criterion is weaker than the Barrow-Tipler principle, but it has the advantage of being sensitive to quantum effects. We find significant consequences for early universe models, in particular, eternal inflation and strictly cyclic universes are ruled out. Within general relativity, the first phase of evolution cannot be inflationary, and it can be ekpyrotic only if the scalar field potential is trustworthy over an infinite field range. Quadratic gravity eliminates all nonaccelerating backgrounds near a putative big bang (thus imposing favorable initial conditions for inflation), while the expected infinite series of higher-curvature quantum corrections eliminates Lorentzian big bang spacetimes altogether. The scenarios that work best with the principle of finite amplitudes are the no-boundary proposal, which gives finite amplitudes in all dynamical theories that we have studied, and string-inspired loitering phases. We also comment on the relationship of our proposal to the swampland conjectures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据