4.6 Article

Does the digital divide matter? Factors and conditions that promote ICT literacy

期刊

TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101536

关键词

Chile; Korea; Digital divide; Computer and information literacy; ICILS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals' computer skills have long been important for education and the labor market, but digital divide still exists. This study examines the impact of socio-demographic variables on students' ICT literacy and compares the characteristics of models for students from Korea and Chile.
Individuals' computer skills have long been noteworthy for both education and the labor market. Although the support provided through curricula in schools develops these skills to a certain extent, digital divide still exists for individuals with different socio-demographic characteristics. The concept of digital divide, used to define individuals who do not have equal access to digital technologies, has started to be seen as a determining factor for digital competencies with its expanding scope. The current study aims to take a perspective to investigate the effect of socio-demographic variables, which may cause digital divide, on students' ICT literacy. With this study, it is sought to explain the effect of current inequalities regarding digital access on students' ICT skills. To this end, the socio-demographic characteristics of the students in the sample of Korea and Chile from the participating countries of the International Computer and Information Literacy Study (ICILS) were examined in the context of ICT literacy. The characteristics of the models created were compared for both countries. While parents' level of education variable stands out for the Chilean model, the internet connection variable is remarkable for the Korean model. It is anticipated that the findings of the research will contribute to understanding the dynamics of the digital divide and its possible consequences, and can be a source for preventive policy steps to be developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据