3.8 Proceedings Paper

Support Vector Machine with K-fold Validation to Improve the Industry's Sustainability Performance Classification

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.074

关键词

Bioenergy industry; K-fold validation; Machine learning; Support vector machine; Sustainability performance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sustainability performance is crucial for industry's competitiveness, and machine learning, specifically the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, shows promise in accurately assessing and classifying sustainability performance. The SVM model, with proper tuning and validation, demonstrated high accuracy in this study.
Sustainability performance plays an important role to improve the industry's competitive advantage. Sustainability performance assessment and application faces high dimensionality, uncertainty, and imprecision data. In this case, a machine learning has an opportunity to be implemented. The objective of this research is to design a machine learning model to assess industry's sustainability performance using Support Vector Machine (SVM). The SVM model was enriched by the model tuning and k-fold validation to enhance the model performance. Our previous research in bioenergy industry inspired us to develop an accurate model for sustainability performance classification and improved Multi-Dimensional Scaling (MDS) model which were commonly applied. The result showed that in the model training stage, SVM with polynomial model had the highest accuracy to classify sustainability performance. Ten folds validation with cost (4), gamma (025) and coef0 (16) as tuning parameter performed 98.32% of accuracy in data testing. This result had proof that SVM with polynomial kernel model was able to classify sustainability performance accurately. This model is potentially substituted previous common models in industry's sustainability assessment which were not adaptive and less accurate. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据