4.6 Article

Magnetic excitations and exchange interactions in the substituted multiferroics (Nd,Tb)Fe3(BO3)4 revealed by inelastic neutron scattering

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 103, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.214412

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-02-00109]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-12-10531]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inelastic neutron scattering spectra of antiferromagnetic ferroborates Nd1-xTbxFe3(BO3)(4) show magnetic excitations of iron and rare-earth subsystems. The magnetic system evolves from easy-plane to easy-axis anisotropy with Tb substitution. The hybridized Fe and Nd branches are influenced by Fe-Nd exchange splitting and the Tb Ising-type anisotropy.
Inelastic neutron scattering spectra in the antiferromagnetic ferroborates Nd1-xTbxFe3(BO3)(4) (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 1) reveal various magnetic excitations of the interacting iron and rare-earth subsystems. We observe an evolution of the magnetic system from easy-plane, in the Tb-free (x = 0) case, to easy-axis anisotropy for samples substituted with Tb. The spectra show hybridized Fe and Nd branches, which are determined by the Fe-Nd exchange splitting of the ground-state Nd3+ doublet. In the easy-plane configuration, near the Brillouin zone center, there are two different pairs of anticrossing quasiacoustic Fe and Nd modes in contrast to the easy-axis state, where the two corresponding pairs of the branches are degenerated. The high-energy (exchange) branches are similar in both spin configurations. The Ising-type anisotropy of the Tb ion prevents the magnetic moment from precession. The increasing of the Tb content changes the effective magnetic anisotropy and stabilizes the easy-axis state. The spin-wave dispersion in the substituted and pure TbFe3(BO3)(4) compounds, which have the same, easy-axis magnetic structure, but different crystal symmetry, strongly differ. The observed spectra were analysed in the frame of linear spin-wave theory and the exchange parameters were determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据