4.7 Article

Prediction of interfaces of geological formations using the multivariate adaptive regression spline method

期刊

UNDERGROUND SPACE
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 252-266

出版社

KEAI PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.undsp.2020.02.006

关键词

Geological interface; Rockhead; Multivariate adaptive regression spline; Spatial prediction

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of National Development
  2. National Research Foundation, Prime Minister's Office under the Land and Liveability National Innovation Challenge (L2 NIC) Research Programme [L2NICCFP2-2015-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study used the MARS method to predict the elevations of geological interfaces, showing good accuracy compared to borehole data. Furthermore, the MARS method was able to generate reasonable prediction intervals that properly reflected the data density and geological complexity.
The design and construction of underground structures are significantly affected by the distribution of geological formations. Prediction of the geological interfaces using limited data has been a difficult task. A multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) method capable of modeling nonlinearities automatically was used in this study to spatially predict the elevations of geological interfaces. Borehole data from two sites in Singapore were used to evaluate the capability of the MARS method for predicting geological interfaces. By comparing the predicted values with the borehole data, it is shown that the MARS method has a mean of root mean square error of 4.4 m for the predicted elevations of the Kallang Formation-Old Alluvium interface. In addition, the MARS method is able to produce reasonable prediction intervals in the sense that the percentage of testing data covered by 95% prediction intervals was close to the associated confidence level, 95%. More importantly, the prediction interval evaluated by the MARS method had a non-constant width that appropriately reflected the data density and geological complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据