Muscle length effect on corticospinal excitability during maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Does sensory input from peripheral mechanoreceptors determine the specific neural control of eccentric contractions? How corticospinal excitability (i.e. muscle responses to motor cortex stimulation) is affected by muscle length has never been investigated during eccentric contractions. What is the main finding and its importance? Muscle length does not influence corticospinal excitability during concentric and isometric maximal contractions, but does during eccentric maximal contractions. This indicates that neural control in eccentric contractions differs from that in concentric and isometric contractions. Neural control of eccentric contractions differs from that of concentric and isometric contractions, but no previous study has compared responses to motor cortex stimulations at long muscle lengths during such contraction types. In this study, we compared the effect of muscle length on corticospinal excitability between maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions of the knee extensors. Twelve men performed 12 maximal concentric, isometric and eccentric voluntary contractions (36 contractions in total), separated by a 5min rest between contraction types. The 12 contractions for the same contraction type were performed every 10s, and transcranial magnetic stimulations (first eight contractions) and electrical femoral nerve stimulations (last four contractions) were superimposed alternately at 75 and 100deg of knee flexion. Average motor evoked potential amplitude, normalized to the maximal M wave amplitude (MEP/M) and cortical silent period duration were calculated for each angle and compared among the contraction types. The MEP/M was lower (-23 and -28%, respectively) during eccentric than both concentric and isometric contractions at 75deg, but similar between contraction types at 100deg (P<0.05). The cortical silent period duration was shorter (-12 and -10%, respectively) during eccentric than both concentric and isometric contractions at 75deg, but longer (+11 and +9%, respectively) during eccentric contractions at 100deg (P<0.05). These results show that corticospinal excitability during eccentric contractions is angle dependent such that cortical inhibitory processes are greater with no alteration of corticospinal excitability at 100deg, whereas this control is reversed at 75deg.