4.6 Article

Hierarchical dual-nanonet of polymer nanofibers and supramolecular nanofibrils for air filtration with a high filtration efficiency, low air resistance and high moisture permeation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 9, 期 24, 页码 14093-14100

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta01505b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Technology RD Program [2016YFB0303300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873152]
  3. Tianjin Science and Technology Plans [20JCQNJC00250, 18PTSYJC00180]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel method for constructing hierarchical nanofibrous membranes with excellent mechanical strength and filtration efficiency, showing promising applications in various filtration fields, especially in personal protective equipment.
Air pollution and public health incidents have become a serious global concern. Hierarchical nanofibrous membranes are considered as high-performance filters with an advanced structure, but their reliable fabrication is still challenging. Herein, a novel methodology involving the combination of a multi-orifices solution blowing technique process and low molecule organogel self-assembly strategy is reported to construct a hierarchical dual-nanonet of polymer nanofibers and supramolecular nanofibrils. Through an adsorption-nucleation-growth model, ultrathin supramolecular nanofibrils (10-30 nm) were assembled in situ within a fluffy solution-blown nanofiber mat with strong inter-fiber connections. Benefiting from the synergistic effects of the ultrathin diameter, small pore size, high porosity and stable inter-fiber connections, the hierarchical dual-nanonet demonstrates robust mechanical strength, a high filtration efficiency (99.999% for 0.3 mu m), low pressure drop (32 Pa), a high quality factor (0.189 Pa-1), and a boosted moisture permeation. The comprehensive performances indicate promising applications in various filtration applications, especially in the field of personal protective equipment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据