4.1 Article

Cambrian helcionelloids (univalved molluscs) from the Korean Peninsula: systematic revision and biostratigraphy

期刊

ALCHERINGA
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 127-139

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03115518.2021.1929479

关键词

Helcionelloida; Korean Peninsula; Mungyeong Group; Coreospira; Hampilina; septa

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B2005578]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2B2005578] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Helcionelloids from the Korean Peninsula have been revised based on a re-examination of type specimens and new material. The fauna consists of various species with unique features, ranging stratigraphically from the Maochuangian to the lower Hsuchuangian stages. Unusual septal features in the apical region of the Korean helcionelloids could have implications for molluscan evolution.
Helcionelloids from the Korean Peninsula are revised based on a re-examination of type specimens and new material collected from the Cambrian Mungyeong Group of South Korea. The fauna comprises Coreospira rugosa, Hampilina goniospira, Dorispira pacifica, cf. Igorella coreanica, and Helcionelloid indet. Coreospira and Hampilina are distinguished from other helcionelloids by their angular junction between dorsal and lateral surfaces, and from each other by the presence or absence of a rounded ridge along the junction, respectively. The Korean helcionelloids range stratigraphically from the base of Maochuangian to the lower Hsuchuangian using the chronostratigraphical scheme from North China; this correlates with upper Stage 4 to the lower Wuliuan Stage. Unusual septal features, such as complex suture lines in Hampilina and a central circular structure in the simple convex septa of Coreospira, occur in the apical region of the Korean helcionelloids, and could have implications for univalved molluscan evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据